Daydreamer ☮

Ask me anything!   Submit   Hello I'm Alex (:


My Tumblr biffle

"I’m not drunk I’m chillin"
me when I’m drunk (via joseguwop)

(via hippie-musician)

— 49 minutes ago with 18172 notes

dirtylittledamsel:

when you blacklist someone and they keep changing their url

image

(via heartless)

— 1 hour ago with 11992 notes

cuphaz:

when i was 14 my teacher made fun of my pimples in front of the whole class and my best friend was furious so whenever she saw the teacher she’s like “OH YOU GET NEW CRINKLES TODAY” “DID YOU LOSE WEIGHT COS APPARENTLY YOU DIDN’T” “HEY MA’AM IS THAT YOUR BUTT OR IS THAT YOUR BELLY THEY LOOK THE SAME” she got detention almost everyday even i told her to stop she still did it anyway if you dont know what golden friendship is this is

(via floydpinkus)

— 1 hour ago with 176793 notes
tyleroakley:

entropiaorganizada:

hookteeth:

… Y’see, now, y’see, I’m looking at this, thinking, squares fit together better than circles, so, say, if you wanted a box of donuts, a full box, you could probably fit more square donuts in than circle donuts if the circumference of the circle touched the each of the corners of the square donut.
So you might end up with more donuts.
But then I also think… Does the square or round donut have a greater donut volume? Is the number of donuts better than the entire donut mass as a whole?
Hrm.
HRM.

A round donut with radius R1 occupies the same space as a square donut with side 2R1. If the center circle of a round donut has a radius R2 and the hole of a square donut has a side 2R2, then the area of a round donut is πR12 - πr22. The area of a square donut would be then 4R12 - 4R22. This doesn’t say much, but in general and  throwing numbers, a full box of square donuts has more donut per donut than a full box of round donuts.The interesting thing is knowing exactly how much more donut per donut we have. Assuming first a small center hole (R2 = R1/4) and replacing in the proper expressions, we have a 27,6% more donut in the square one (Round: 15πR12/16 ≃ 2,94R12, square: 15R12/4 = 3,75R12). Now, assuming a large center hole (R2 = 3R1/4) we have a 27,7% more donut in the square one (Round: 7πR12/16 ≃ 1,37R12, square: 7R12/4 = 1,75R12). This tells us that, approximately, we’ll have a 27% bigger donut if it’s square than if it’s round.
tl;dr: Square donuts have a 27% more donut per donut in the same space as a round one.

Thank you donut side of Tumblr.

tyleroakley:

entropiaorganizada:

hookteeth:

… Y’see, now, y’see, I’m looking at this, thinking, squares fit together better than circles, so, say, if you wanted a box of donuts, a full box, you could probably fit more square donuts in than circle donuts if the circumference of the circle touched the each of the corners of the square donut.

So you might end up with more donuts.

But then I also think… Does the square or round donut have a greater donut volume? Is the number of donuts better than the entire donut mass as a whole?

Hrm.

HRM.

A round donut with radius R1 occupies the same space as a square donut with side 2R1. If the center circle of a round donut has a radius R2 and the hole of a square donut has a side 2R2, then the area of a round donut is πR12 - πr22. The area of a square donut would be then 4R12 - 4R22. This doesn’t say much, but in general and  throwing numbers, a full box of square donuts has more donut per donut than a full box of round donuts.

The interesting thing is knowing exactly how much more donut per donut we have. Assuming first a small center hole (
R2 = R1/4) and replacing in the proper expressions, we have a 27,6% more donut in the square one (Round: 15πR12/16 ≃ 2,94R12, square: 15R12/4 = 3,75R12). Now, assuming a large center hole (R2 = 3R1/4) we have a 27,7% more donut in the square one (Round: 7πR12/16 ≃ 1,37R12, square: 7R12/4 = 1,75R12). This tells us that, approximately, we’ll have a 27% bigger donut if it’s square than if it’s round.


tl;dr: Square donuts have a 27% more donut per donut in the same space as a round one.

Thank you donut side of Tumblr.

(Source: nimstrz, via hi)

— 2 hours ago with 351957 notes

pizza:

fishingboatproceeds:

pizza:

did u guys see me at the oscars

You looked great, pizza. Congrats on everything. I love you.

Thanks, John. I love you too.

(via darthrader)

— 2 hours ago with 430274 notes
relahvant:

benedictedcumberbabeof221:

acitymadeofsong:

wasureneba:

tomlinfaggot:

liquidpixie:

dialray:

ultimagus:

littlewhinging:

still one of the best things ive ever seen.
slaughter melon reporting for duty.

BROCONUT

m a n g ERI NE 

FUCKING SLAUGHTERMELON

too good to not reblog

How can I not reblog slaughtermelon?

isn’t bombegranite cucumber an actor

I knew that was coming

big fig

relahvant:

benedictedcumberbabeof221:

acitymadeofsong:

wasureneba:

tomlinfaggot:

liquidpixie:

dialray:

ultimagus:

littlewhinging:

still one of the best things ive ever seen.

slaughter melon reporting for duty.

BROCONUT

m a n g ERI NE

FUCKING SLAUGHTERMELON

too good to not reblog

How can I not reblog slaughtermelon?

isn’t bombegranite cucumber an actor

I knew that was coming

big fig

(via kssmyassss)

— 7 hours ago with 391472 notes

old-school-shit:

gogul-mun:

slimmcharles:

makhaillamorris:

This man…

Translation: Don’t waste your time and energy on the wrong light.

*sigh*

wake up call

(Source: gambxno, via darthrader)

— 8 hours ago with 136035 notes
vonlovely:

brazil201:

it snowed again so OLAF came back


OMG

vonlovely:

brazil201:

it snowed again so OLAF came back

OMG

(via kssmyassss)

— 8 hours ago with 75275 notes

jpgay:

we’ve all had crushes we very strongly regret

(via black-hell)

— 8 hours ago with 604623 notes